The battle for words is continual. Those who stand against religion reach with withered hands to create a potion of the empirical with their fanciful imagination of how things should be.

‎”If Christians want us to back off, then they need to admit that we can be good without a god…”

Allow for me to say, the sort of *good* that exists for this person apart from any belief in God is the sort of goodness by which I loudly proclaim you can be *good* with.

Anyone attempting to answer the question, “what does it mean to be human?” Necessarily, steps beyond the bounds of empirical/scientific inquiry. This is not to say the natural sciences do not play a part in their response, it is to say the part it plays is not because anything empirical told them so.

Yeah, I get sick of hearing these power words like ‘bigot’ being tossed out there to basically refer to people you disagree with. As though YOU are NOT a bigot on some issue!

"If salvation is not a real participation in the resurrected life, the glorified and grace-filled Humanity of Christ, then we are left with a man-made religion of “ideas” and concepts, an imaginary “relationship” with God that cannot truly transform and save us."

— Father Michael Shanbour

How do we determine the answer to the question, “who am I?” Is there only *one* way to determine who we are? How does this relate, if at all, to the saying, “I accept myself as I am.”?

http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3oiil7

Think but Shut up if Not What I Think?