"

SHOULD we look to kings and princes to put right the inequalities between rich and poor?

Should we require soldiers to come and seize the rich person’s gold and distribute it among his destitute neighbors?

Should we beg the emperor to impose a tax on the rich so great that it reduces them to the level of the poor and then to share the proceeds of that tax among everyone?

Equality imposed by force would achieve nothing, and do much harm. Those who combined both cruel hearts and sharp minds would soon find ways of making themselves rich again.

Worse still, the rich whose gold was taken away would feel bitter and resentful; while the poor who received the gold from the hands of soldiers would feel no gratitude, because no generosity would have prompted the gift.

Far from bringing moral benefit to society, it would actually do moral harm.

Material justice cannot be accomplished by compulsion, a change of heart will not follow. The only way to achieve true justice is to change people’s hearts first—and then they will joyfully share their wealth.

"

— St John Chrysostom, Collected in “On Living Simply” by Robert van der Weyer, Sermon XLIII

The battle for words is continual. Those who stand against religion reach with withered hands to create a potion of the empirical with their fanciful imagination of how things should be.

A new employee says, “did I do that right?” I said, “All you did was take their name and number; how could you do that wrong?!”

‎”If Christians want us to back off, then they need to admit that we can be good without a god…”

Allow for me to say, the sort of *good* that exists for this person apart from any belief in God is the sort of goodness by which I loudly proclaim you can be *good* with.

Anyone attempting to answer the question, “what does it mean to be human?” Necessarily, steps beyond the bounds of empirical/scientific inquiry. This is not to say the natural sciences do not play a part in their response, it is to say the part it plays is not because anything empirical told them so.

There is no conflict between science and belief in God. Just as there is no conflict between science and the belief there is no God.

Concise version of what Dr. John Lennox said.

We are here because of a male and female. There is something unique and important about this arrangement. Does the state have a vested interest in encouraging this arrangement and placing it in a unique status from other relationships?

Yeah, I get sick of hearing these power words like ‘bigot’ being tossed out there to basically refer to people you disagree with. As though YOU are NOT a bigot on some issue!

"If salvation is not a real participation in the resurrected life, the glorified and grace-filled Humanity of Christ, then we are left with a man-made religion of “ideas” and concepts, an imaginary “relationship” with God that cannot truly transform and save us."

— Father Michael Shanbour

"Now Christians love to live in rich homes, sit at a rich table, dress in rich clothing, ride in rich carriages and horses, though they may see the want and poverty of their neighbors. Hence it is evident that they only love themselves, and not God or their neighbors."

— St. Tikhon of Zadonsk